Drugstore Cowboy

已搬迁到 :http://drugstore73.blogspot.com/

导航

Blog统计

公告

访问统计:



相 册:
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from drugstore.donews. Make your own badge here.


文章

收藏

相册

links

存档


正在读取评论……

2006年02月


相信经常使用eDonkey、eMule等P2P工具的用户对Razorback 2.0这个P2P服务器不会感到陌生。电影协会(MPA)昨天宣布了一条惊人的消息:这个“可同时招待130万用户共享文件的世界头号eDonkey P2P服务器”已经被关闭,其所有者也已经被瑞士警方逮捕。

MPA首席执行官兼主席Dan Glickman昨天在声明中称:“通过Razorback 2.0共享非法的版权保护作品非常容易。我们已经断掉了他们提供互联网盗版的网络,这是我们在全球范围内反盗版努力过程中具有积极意义的一步。”

Razorback 2.0不同于常规的内容服务器,它实际上是一个目录服务器,记录着电驴网络里上亿份文件所处的实际位置,而非存储文件本身,所以,长期以来它靠着这种模糊的定位在法律边缘游走,有惊无险地为超过上百万电驴用户提供了一个乌托邦式的文件交换平台。世界主要eDonkey、eMule P2P服务器每6分钟自动更新一次,目前全球大约有257个eDonkey索引服务器正在活动。Razorback 2.0在这份名单上排第五位,招待用户约35.5万人。经过测试,Razorback 2.0服务器仍对IP信号有反应,但其索引服务已经离线。P2P用户不得不转向Razorback 2.3、Razorback 2.4等其它eDonkey服务器,而可接待5万人以上这种服务器大约有90个。与此同时,eDonkey2000网站也暂时失去了响应。

不过,至少有一位Usenet新闻组用户报告说,eDonkey网络用户在21日凌晨一点(美国东部时间)又恢复了平常的350万用户(MPA在这点上倒没有夸张),而P2P新闻网站Slyck报告说eMule网络用户在当天下午增加到了较高的410万人,大概是为了回应MPA的行为。

eMule等P2P软件开发人员的一份开源讨论文档显示,Razorback 2.0等服务器同时管理着很多P2P客户端,eDonkey只是其中的一小部分。目前的P2P协议软件分支甚多,很难真正融合到一个网络内,因此eMule等项目正致力于根据开源协议打造一个兼容性P2P网络。布鲁塞尔-洛杉矶电

比利时和瑞士警方通力合作,关闭了P2P世界里最臭名昭著的Razorback 2.0服务器。它是头号非法文件交换平台,同时有130万用户通过此平台搜索和传输大约1.7亿份文件,相当一部分是受版权保护的电影、软件、游戏、音乐,和电视节目。用户偏布全球,但大部分位于欧洲。

21日晨,瑞士警方在其住所逮捕了Razorback 2.0的运管人员并搜查了整栋住宅;同时,比利时警方在其服务器托管地查封了Razorback 2.0服务器——靠近布鲁塞尔的Zaventem。自2004年11月以来,所有位于美国本土的电驴服务器均已被关闭,现在这项行动正转向欧洲。

Razorback 2.0的管理人员出于明显的商业动机维护着Razorback 2.0服务器,他们接受所谓的“用户捐赠”并在网站上销售广告,却对网线里流动的非法文件视而不见,这些文件涉及情色、炸弹制造,甚至还有恐怖分子的训练录像。

世界反盗版组织的执行副总裁John G.Malcolm对此评论道:“Razorback 2.0不仅是个非法文件的集散地,它还是一个危及社会的痼疾”;“我对瑞士和比利时警方的行动深表赞同,他们的行动有助于阻止盗版在全球范围内传播。”

以前,Razorback 2.0的网页上有个在线人数的计数器,Razorback 2.0的负责人据此自称是世界上最大的P2P站点并以此为傲;现在,任何一个企图连接Razorback 2.0的用户均会收到以下信息:“Razorback 2.0已失去响应……”

Razorback 2.0已经失去响应

来源:http://tech.163.com/06/0223/10/2AL1GOK3000915AS.html




SHORT FILMS: Experience the exclusive collection of Short Films from the 2006 Sundance Film Festival without even needing a ticket! Free from the constraints of running time, subplots, and other feature-length expectations, this year’s Short Film artists take all the chances they can.

GD_HALF_MAN.jpgA HALF MAN
Directed by Firas Momani
TRT 5:00//Color
GD_Supermarket.jpgA SUPERMARKET LOVE SONG
Directed by Daniel Outram
TRT 13:00/35 mm/Color
GD_BEFORE_DAWN.jpgBEFORE DAWN
Directed by Bálint Kenyeres
TRT 12:00/35 mm/Color
Award Winner
GD_The_Beginning.jpgBEGINNING OF THE END
Directed by Gustavo Spolidoro
TRT 7:00/35 mm/Color
GD_BUG_CRUSH.jpgBUGCRUSH
Directed by Carter Smith
TRT 35:00/16 mm/Color
Award Winner
GD_CLARA.jpgCLARA
Directed by Van Sowerwine
TRT 7:00/DV/Color
GD_COMMON_PRACTICE.jpgCOMMON PRACTICE
Directed by Marcos Efron
TRT 11:00/35 mm/Color
GD_DIVORCE_LEMONADE.jpgDIVORCE LEMONADE
Directed by Justin Hayward
TRT 7:00/16 mm/Color
GD_Exoticore.jpgEXOTICORE
Directed by Nicolas Provost
TRT 20:00/DV/Color
GD_FABLE.jpgFABLE
Directed by Daniel Sousa
TRT 7:00//Color
GD_FIRST_DATE.jpgFIRST DATE
Directed by Gary Huggins
TRT 20:00/DV/Color
GD_Fourteen.jpgFOURTEEN
Directed by Nicole Barnette
TRT 7:00/DV/Color
GD_Fumi.jpgFUMI AND THE BAD LUCK FOOT
Directed by David Chai
TRT 7:00/Other/Color
GD_Gopher_Broke.jpgGOPHER BROKE
Directed by Jeff Fowler & Tim Miller
TRT 4:00/Other/Color
GD_Hello.jpgHELLO, THANKS
Directed by Andrew Blubaugh
TRT 8:00//Color
GD_High_Plains_Water.jpgHIGH PLAINS WINTER
Directed by Cindy Stillwell
TRT 10:00/Other/Color
GD_Hold_Up.jpgHOLD UP
Directed by Madeleine Olnek
TRT 7:00/DV/Color
GD_La_Muerte.jpgLA MUERTE ES PEQUEÑA
Directed by Fellipe Gamarano Barbosa
TRT 17:00/DV/Color
GD_Lighten_Up.jpgLIGHTEN UP
Directed by John Viener
TRT 8:00/DV/Color
GD_Los_ABCs.jpgLOS ABC'S: ¡QUE VIVAN LOS MUERTOS!
Directed by John Jota Leaños
TRT 5:00/Other/Color
GD_Headscarf.jpgMARJOUN AND THE FLYING HEADSCARF
Directed by Susan Youssef
TRT 9:00/35 mm/Color
GD_Max_and_Josh.jpgMAX AND JOSH
Directed by Kathryn Ann Busby
TRT 7:00/DV/Color
GD_Mommas_Boy.jpgMOMMA'S BOY
Directed by John Bryant
TRT 16:00/DV/Color
GD_Etienne.jpgMONSIEUR ETIENNE
Directed by Yann Chayia
TRT 22:00/35 mm/Color
GD_One_Sung_Hero.jpgONE SUNG HERO
Directed by Samantha Kurtzman-Counter
TRT 10:00/DV/Color
GD_Redemtitude.jpgREDEMPTITUDE
Directed by Nathan and David Zellner
TRT 11:00/DV/Color
GD_Robins.jpgROBIN'S BIG DATE
Directed by James Duffy
TRT 7:00/DV/Color
GD_The_Pity_Card.jpgTHE PITY CARD
Directed by Bob Odenkirk
TRT 12:00/DV/Color
GD_Transaction.jpgTRANSACTION
Directed by Jacques Thelemaque
TRT 14:00/DV/Color
GD_True_North.jpgTRUE NORTH
Directed by Isaac Julien
TRT 14:00/DV/Color
GD_Uten_Tittel.jpgUTEN TITTEL
Directed by Anja Breien
TRT 14:00/35 mm/Color
GD_Viscera.jpgVISCERA
Directed by Leighton Pierce
TRT 11:00/DV/Color
GD_Yesterday.jpgYESTERDAY, I THINK
Directed by Becalelis Brodskis
TRT 6:00/35 mm/Color
GD_You_Turned.jpgYOU TURNED BACK AND HELD MY HAND
Directed by Gabriela Tollman
TRT 6:00/DV/Color
GD_Ihsan.jpgYOUR DARK HAIR IHSAN
Directed by Tala Hadid
TRT 13:00/35 mm/Color

来源:http://festival.sundance.org/2006/




photo

photo

photo

photo

photo




街头系列1998纽约 

 

街头系列1996纽约 

 

街头系列1998东京 

 

街头系列1998墨西哥 

 

马里奥 1978 

 

头像系列6号2001 

 

头像系列23号2001 

 

好莱坞系列 休斯顿 

 

好莱坞系列 巴吞鲁日 

 

街头系列1998纽约 

 

街头系列1998加尔各答 

 

街头系列1994东京 

 

街头系列1994东京 

 

街头系列1998墨西哥 

 

康德纳斯杂志商业图片 

 

街头系列1998布鲁塞尔

 

 

作者:Andy Grundberg 编译:李郁

近来,由于电影似乎很热衷于描写真实事件,所以菲力浦-洛卡.迪柯西亚 (Philip-Lorca diCorcia)拍摄的那些拥挤的城市“街头系列”(Streetwork),(图1)就很容易被看作是反映日常生活的电影剧照。它们之间确有相似之处:远离照相机的人工光和自然光混合造成了戏剧化的效果,给这些匆匆过客的身上披上指甲油般的光泽,就象好莱坞电影里的一样。迪柯西亚没有拍摄大众明星和设计师作品,取而代之的是捕捉了那些在坚硬而亢奋的钢筋混凝土空间里穿行的人们,那些匿名的、在移动中不经意成为演员的陌路人。

迪柯西亚的作品表达了语言不能表达的,在心理上和政治上异国他乡的感觉。照片上的人有着同样的紧皱的眉头和沉重的眼睑,就象克林顿在白宫弹劾投票前展示给我们的表情一样。他们走出地铁楼梯和办公大楼,用移动电话通话,迪柯西亚的被摄对象看起来是分离、分裂和冷酷无情的。甚至在有人与人交流的时候,例如那张“纽约1996”(图2),两个人似乎正在互相问候,而他们又被另一个人完全挡住了,他们的交流是不清晰和非决定性的。迪柯西亚浓缩了那些几乎躲藏在私人保护罩中人物的关联,而这些元素在二十五年前的加里.威诺格兰德(Garry Winogrand)和乔尔.梅耶罗维茨(Joel Meyerowitz)的街头摄影中就有很多。

梅耶罗维茨的街头作品也是彩色的,这使得他的图像很明显是迪柯西亚这些大(30×40英寸)而清晰的作品的先辈之一。但比较起来,迪柯西亚和杰夫.沃近来的照片有更多的相似点。沃的照片尺寸更大也更受控制,但它们传达出同样的超现实感。在沃的照片里,暗含的叙述是很重要的编码,唤起艺术史上的指涉并经常直接点出移民、劳工、种族和性等社会问题。在迪柯西亚这里,场景则较少受到控制,因此其含义很难限定且具有更多的偶发性质。我们如何去理解迪柯西亚的这幅“东京1998”(图3)呢?一个年轻人在打移动电话,他购物打扮的女友在他旁边,行人从他们身边走过,街头一块广告牌尺寸的电视屏幕在播放节目。还有这幅“墨西哥城1998”(图4),一个商人走出地铁的楼梯,恰好和这个在街头商亭做小生意的妇女并肩。在视觉上这些照片里的一切都能被看作是真实的吗?迪柯西亚的意义似乎无所不在但最终难以捉摸。

现在也可以这样说:经典的街头摄影,梅耶罗维茨、威诺格兰德等以及所有的那一类街头摄影家,只要他们不是伴随着确定性工作,我们就可以把他们的作品解释成:生活的真实切片,引用亨利.卡蒂艾.布勒松的名言就是“决定性瞬间”,抓住流动的实时。而迪柯西亚并非如此。这里我们必须问,有多少特定的工作构成了看起来真实,同样的对于电影,它们中有多少是确切地(或仅仅)真实。这是在最近几年已经被探究过的领域,不光是迪柯西亚、杰夫.沃还有蒂娜.巴尼(Tina Barney)和比特.斯楚里(Beat Streuli)。这些艺术家沿着现实主义的光谱工作,包括从纯粹的堪的派(Candid)到完全的戏剧化。迪柯西亚处于中间位置,举个例子,在他90年代初的洛城街头皮条客系列中,男孩们在现实主义的场景里摆出现实主义的姿势,但他们的表演是艺术家出钱购买的并完全控制。而在这些街头作品中,他实际上放弃了摆布被摄者,但保留了对场景的控制,还有最明显的,他仍然使用人造光源。

迪柯西亚的首要兴趣之一,好象是城市设施中人们文化行为的,接近全部的同质化记录,这也许能解释为什么他在世界各个城市旅行却看到的是相同的东西。作品的标题告诉了你这是:柏林、加尔各达、伦敦、洛山基、墨西哥城、纽约、东京。但这些设施,包括建筑物、标志图样和人行道,或多或少的可以互换,仅仅只是行人的面部特征有区别。有一个猜测是迪柯西亚试图在当代同一化的都市体验和单独的个体特征之间寻找荒谬的对照,这些反映在他对地点的选择上,在一方面,他也关注特殊的姿势、表情、身体语言和其他。

引人注意的光线效果,使人物成为这些照片的主题。他们大多数由日光照亮,但阴影的位置却不相符合。电子闪光灯的照明形成了意想不到的阴影和意想不到的高光。通过把闪光灯悬挂在路边的灯柱或路牌上,隐藏在高处或是画面以外,迪柯西亚确保了他对主题叙述是间接的。他在路边安置好相机,等待毫无戒备的演员进入表演区。在他的主要作品中,极少有人知道他们正处于镜头的中心,这有助于使观看者忽略摄影师的存在。结果,我们的注意力集中到了这些影像本身而不是它们的制造者。就象“马里奥1978”(图5),在迪柯西亚这幅著名照片中,一个男人沮丧地盯着一个敞开的亮堂堂的冰箱内部。电影摄影的技巧和静态摄影的纪实传统并入一个具有真实性的、可以自由介入的赝品之中。

迪柯西亚的人工光源给予了整个街头舞台般的戏剧气氛,后来的系列“头像”(Head),又延续这种工作方式并使之达到一个新的水平。这一次,迪柯西亚在纽约时代广场上隐藏了他的摄影器材和闪光灯,并使用野生动物摄影师经常使用的望远镜头,捕捉到来往行人清晰明确的半身像。这些照片同样很大(有40×50英寸),狭窄的景深造成黑暗模糊的背景,精确而强烈的光线刻画出人物的表情和气质,使得这些匿名人物的肖像,如同公告版上的电影明星或巴洛克式绘画上的贵族一样具有纪念碑意义(图6)(图7)。

但是不论迪柯西亚的照相机和他的被摄主体之间的关联是如何的间接,他作为摄影者的在场却决不是明显的:这些照片,连同他所有早期的作品,完全放弃了街头摄影的现实主义惯例。奇异的灯光效果和凝固的怪异姿势提示我们正处在沃克.伊文斯(Walker Evans)所说的“纪录风格”的领域。伊文斯的这一术语曾用在他对自己作品的说明中,简单说来就是,对真实生活的现实主义描写,无论在静态摄影还是在纪录片电影里,都依靠某种特定的视觉惯例来达成。然而他的悖论在于:无论纪实摄影的观念如何强调中立并因此做到客观公正,它的无中介性却都是经过摄影师个人的眼光所获得。

迪柯西亚认可伊文斯视觉惯例的概念,他重新使用了这些概念,并赋予了它们新的含义。这些带给他的作品后现代的自我意识和超然意味。尽管和南.哥丁(Nan Goldin)或杰克.皮尔森(Jack Pierson)一样,迪柯西亚也对不可预知的和心理情感上的主题充满了兴趣,但他并不打算在某一种模式上耗费过多时间。这一策略使得迪柯西亚避免了落入自我重复和多愁善感的窠臼,但从另一个不重要的方面来看,他的工作也许会被指责成仅仅是某种窥淫欲望。这样一个怪异的摄影者拍摄的怪异图像,激发了观看者的无穷疑惑,他们不得不暂停观看,去思考这样一个内在的矛盾:因为这一刻摄影者的同时在场与缺席,造成了这些图像既可以被清晰地阅读,却又特别地难以捉摸。

(原文刊载于ArtForum, 是Feb, 1999)


迪柯西亚与FLASH ART杂志Josefina Ayerza关于作品“街头”的访谈录
编译:李郁

Josefina Ayerza:你的作品是怎样开始受到注意并被广泛展出的?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:在70年代末到80年代初由Pat Hearn开始的。

Josefina Ayerza:你著名的摄影作品“好莱坞系列”描写了男性卖淫,它们是在什么时候,如何开始的?(图8)(图9)
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:我开始拍摄在洛城圣莫尼卡大道地区的男性卖淫......是在那个地区卖淫和吸毒泛滥时期的某一天,首次展出则是在1993年,现代艺术博物馆。

Josefina Ayerza:你是如何及时地改变了你的主题的?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:现如今我非常的直接。自我毁灭的理想不复存在……我甚至迷恋毁灭反资产阶级的人。

Josefina Ayerza:你生活的改变更甚于想法的改变吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:我和妻子结婚多年,现在有了一个很小的小孩,这是现如今仅有的。“明天就是责任”听起来很吸引人,当名誉成为过眼云烟,你会渐渐体会到死亡的宿命。

Josefina Ayerza:我能假设在你的言语和作品中涉及到了某种反讽吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:不,不是反讽,也不是犬儒主义,我在作品中所做的见证了事物本身幽默的一面。

Josefina Ayerza:那是你摄影的主题之一吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:在大多数时候它是摄影的主题,也是街头生活的要素。

Josefina Ayerza:你是如何选择角色的?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:他们来自社会的边缘,这些人不被关注但仍然是社会典型。

Josefina Ayerza:这个身处纽约,拿着雨伞、报纸和移动电话的人,他怎么是社会的典型呢?(图10)
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:他是在这个地区人人都梦想成为的那种人物——这里是曼哈顿岛第5街和第52街——这个人是这里所有事物的缩影。

Josefina Ayerza:说得详细点……
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:当时下着雨,街上人来人往,我带着相机,等待着发生什么。那些陈腐的场景或易于发生的事情,我静待它们自然出现,要发生什么我不能完全察觉,那里经常有比我预期的更多也可能比我想要的少,那一刻要出现什么只能靠运气。拿着雨伞、报纸还有移动电话的那个人来了,他似乎正通过移动电话下达一些不必要的命令。此外,他的雨伞上印有“四季大酒店”字样,说明他是一个来自俄克拉荷马州的石油商,明显的一个商人,一个面部无表情的人。你看出幽默之处了吗?

Josefina Ayerza:你的意思是你的摄影作品很滑稽?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:我不能说我把他们表现得很滑稽,我在关注批评,你不能避免表达你的判断。至于这个完整的情形,它使得这个人置身一个阶级,他在豪华酒店专用雨伞的保护之下,这应该是只有城市酒店才提供给客人的印有标记的雨伞,只有在东京才有这样的事。

Josefina Ayerza:你和这个人交谈了吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:我没有和这些人交谈,我选择的这些人从不和我说话,他们只是一部分。我选择那些我在其中的存在显得不重要的照片......只有一个孩子看到我一次,还有这些印度人看了,他们在看我的摄影设备。(图11)

Josefina Ayerza:除了照相机之外,你还使用什么摄影设备?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:我经常用三脚架,因为它可以支撑起相机挡住我的脸。

Josefina Ayerza:他们知道你在拍摄他们吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:他们知道。

Josefina Ayerza:在东京的时候,他们注意到你了吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:在东京是九月,那里有太多的东西分散人们的注意,他们并没有注意到我。市中心里所有的建筑感觉都象是办公楼。在一天中的某个时候,人们从办公楼里被释放回家,走在一个隧道里,每个人看起来都是低垂着眼睛或是带着眼镜,仿佛与世隔绝,他们被生活击垮了。虽然那些照片有欺骗性,但这一切不言自明。(图12)(图13)

Josefina Ayerza:墨西哥城也是你选择拍摄的地方之一。
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:这个女人手里的白色塑料袋真是一件令人烦心东西,为什么有些人要拿一个空的袋子?(图14)

Josefina Ayerza:菲力浦,这是在第三世界。她不想用报纸包食品带回家。你的作品中带有第三人的观点吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:的确有第三人的观点。观看者就是叙述者。

Josefina Ayerza:观看者宁愿是被动的叙述者吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:被动也可以表现为主动。

Josefina Ayerza:你把谁称作你的老师?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:Jan Groover是我的老师。

Josefina Ayerza:你做商业的摄影吗?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:我和Pico-Tyer一道为康德纳斯(Condé Nast)杂志工作过12天,还为一家旅行杂志工作了8年(图15)。

Josefina Ayerza:对于心理分析你有什么观点?
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:心理分析......它表明犹豫不决是一个问题。你会有心悬不定和憋闷窒息的感觉。所以你开始抱怨你的妻子,并由此成了习惯,无人能够避免。而我更象是一个“12步心理疗法”的产物,上了戒瘾的瘾。

Josefina Ayerza:你是不是在说,布鲁塞尔的这三个男人在这个性感的女士之后走进这间大厦,却几乎没有看她,是因为他们沉溺于自己的生意之中,而与外部世界相疏离(图16)。
Philip-Lorca diCorcia:这完全是巧合,不是表现......真理源自事实。你可能会想这种分离是偶然的,的确是的,但它们依然带着你接近真理。




以1985年盐湖城的胖客运动为背景,通过两个PUNK的日常生活继续深入,其中一PUNK发扬其一贯的批判视角,终于发现,无因反抗其实和对金钱的无闹追求其实没什么分别. 但是,问题在于,并没有什么"正确"的视角, 既没有任何容易的解决之道.

既然是一部音乐片,OST还是要留意一下,它收录了The Stooges,Ramones,Blondie,Generation X,The Velvet Underround和Dead Kennedys等老家伙们的曲子.

[info. From Here]There are basically three groups of people that would like this film. The first would be fans of similar apocalyptic films (anything made by Gregg Araki). The second group would be adult males between the ages of, say, 25 and 32, that were not into "The Joshua Tree" when it came out. Lastly, squealing fans of spastic actor Matthew Lillard may also enjoy the movie. And, no – I only fit into the first two categories.

The lizard-like Lillard (Wing Commander) plays Stevo, a nihilistic teenager growing up in Salt Lake City (thus the S.L.C. of the title) during the mid ‘80s. He’s a punk, but has little to rebel against, admitting in the film’s opening line that "to be an anarchist in Salt Lake City was pretty hard." Luckily, Stevo can still dye his hair blue, beat up rednecks (the S.L.C. punk’s mortal enemy) and hang around with his best friend, the mohawked Heroin Bob (Michael A. Goorjian, Justin on TV’s Party of Five). Don’t worry, Bob doesn’t really do heroin. He’s afraid of needles and the name is a joke.

S.L.C. Punk!, written and directed by James Merendino (Livers Ain’t Cheap), has a fantastic soundtrack, featuring The Ramones, Black Flag and Minor Threat. In fact, the opening credits are a bit of a tribute to Black Flag, showing all of the band’s album covers changed slightly to accommodate the names of the film’s talent. Especially funny was Til Schweiger’s (The Replacement Killers) album, which was stamped "import," as he is German.

Lillard will probably never be better than he is here – a bored, snotty, upper-middle-class twerp with A.D.D. and parents intent on him going to Harvard Law School, while he would rather beat the piss out of everybody in the name of rebellion. The movie is almost filmed in a documentary style, with Stevo often narrating to the camera, describing why he and his friends are doing what they’re doing. He also points out the different "tribes" in S.L.C., like the Mods, who would be somewhat equivalent to the Socials in The Outsiders. But rest assured that S.L.C. Punk!’s young cast isn’t anywhere near the hotbed of talent found in Francis Ford Coppola’s film, although Lillard is often as endearing as a young C. Thomas Howell

 

点击下载--SLC PUNK!--CLICK HERE DOWNLOAD [EMULE]

点击下载字幕--SUB--CLICK HERE DOWNLOAD [EMULE] (链接可能有误,骡子上可以找到英文的)




The Man With The Golden Arm (Hart Sharp Video / 50th Anniversary Special Edition)

老汉FRANK SINATRA 主演的电影,典型好莱坞老片子.这个片子是讲述SINATRA扮演的药瘾者相JAZZ乐手转行的过程[涉及剧情的东西,不要相信俺写的],找不到字幕,慎下!

点击下载--THE MAN WITH GOLDEN ARM--CLICK HERE DOWNLOAD [EMULE]

 

[A REVIEW]Frank Sinatra's portrayal of a junkie dealer-turned-drummer in The Man With The Golden Arm can make a viewer wonder why Darren Aronofsky bothered with Requiem For A Dream at all. Junkies all have the same story--it's a tale of degradation, desperation, and dead dreams, and it has only two possible endings, kicking or death. The only thing that makes The Man With The Golden Arm a thrilling drama is the skill with which its characters are drawn.
    Sinatra's Frankie Machine is a dealer, working illegal card games, who returns to his old neighborhood from jail/detox revitalized, ready to throw over his petty-criminal past and become a jazz drummer. This doesn't sit well with his wheelchair-bound wife, Zosch (Eleanor Parker). A querulous nag, she persistently sands away at his ambitions and his self-esteem, campaigning to keep him enslaved not only to his old boss, but to her as well. His driving put her in the chair, and she'll be damned if she's going to let him forget it, or escape her grip. She's particularly scared because she can see Sinatra moving towards Kim Novak's Molly, a downstairs neighbor who gives him the encouragement (musical and romantic) that his wife can't, or won't.
    Sinatra is very convincing as Frankie Machine, particularly when he begins drifting back towards full-blown addiction. Presumably his singing career afforded him plenty of opportunities to observe junkie musicians up close. When he starts to twitch and sweat, to cast himself, panicked, from one side of the street to the other in search of his pusher, Louie (Darren McGavin), it never seems like the overly melodramatic acting of someone who doesn't know the territory.
    McGavin, though, is the center of the movie. He's a magnetic presence, treating the sale of heroin like a seduction rather than a mere cash transaction. Ever since Milton's Paradise Lost, the Devil's had all the best lines; McGavin's part is the best in the movie, and he knows it. He slides through the frame, half Bela Lugosi and half Snidely Whiplash, dangerous and blackly hilarious at the same time.
    As fascinating a character study as this movie is (and, with the exception of a one-note, unfunny sidekick played by Arnold Stang, Golden Arm's characters are fully fleshed out), it's about half an hour too long. There's enough plot here for two movies at least, and towards the end, the viewer can be forgiven if attention starts to flag. Director Otto Preminger's stagy angles and long takes sometimes fail to grant the movie's most dramatic moments their full impact. Still, the vast majority of this movie is better than ninety percent of what's out there now, and if nothing else, The Man With The Golden Arm proves that drug stories aren't exclusively the territory of hip, nihilistic '90s film-school wunderkinder




中国电信试点按流量计费[来源:SOLIDOT.ORG]

昨天刚传来升级宽带的消息,今天就添了条流量计费的信息。南京电信已开始对宽带上网服务实行按流量计费,并推出若干套餐。以代表最高消费水准的“至尊宽带”为例:速率4Mbps,流量限制60G,月资费标准为180元。而100元包月的1Mbps“极速宽带”,也被限制为30G流量。此前,南京电信以BT下载影响带宽为由,已将原来小区宽带由10Mbps限制为1Mbps。




01.米国大众-性,药物,锐舞以及肉,新世代群像?

片子的副标题已经明确告诉你内容,片子正在当,还没看到.amazon 编者按写道:American Massive is a real eye opener to the American Rave scene. This film was conceived by Steve and Jon Levy, owners of America's premiere electronic music label, Moonshine Music, and brought to life by up-and-coming Los Angeles director Thomas Trail. The concept was to document a brief moment from this amazing movement.

Shot on the Moonshine Overamerica 2000 tour, American Massive shows you the rave scene from its participants' perspective: the DJs, the promoters, the artists, and the kids. 24 Cities, 13,000 miles in 32 days with some of America's biggest names in electronic music, including AK1200, Christopher Lawrence, Carl Cox, Cirrus, D:Fuse, Dara, Micro, Frankie Bones, and Keoki. What happens along the way is part "Spinal Tap," part "COPS," but mostly "Rave & Roll."

点击下载-AMERICAN MASSIVE-CLICK HERE DOWNLOAD[EMULE]

02.速食的/低贱的和失控的

刚当下来的片子,也还没有看,扫过看上去还是比较有趣.AMAZON编者按又写道:Amazon.com
George, Dave, Ray, and Rodney. Not a singing group, but four real-life individuals dedicated to controlling the entities that don't take kindly to their efforts. George Mendonca is a topiary gardener who spends his time taming tendrils of plant life into animal shapes. Why? Because he can, and apparently it's no easy job. One slip of the clipper and a green and leafy body part can go bye-bye for years. Dave Hoover takes on big cats under the big top. An admirer of the famous lion tamer, Clyde Beatty, Dave comes out of the lion ring covered with sweat. Not from working hard, but from hand-trembling fear. Ray Mendez, a mole-rat expert, waxes eloquently about the social structure of these sightless, hairless natural wonders who wear their teeth on the outside of their lips. But if you want to see a real wacko at work, watch Rodney Brooks, a robotics expert who is convinced our extinction will be the first step in a takeover of tin men.

In Fast, Cheap & Out of Control, documentarian Errol Morris proves that the weird and obscure are just as interesting as the rich and famous. Morris tries to add depth to his subjects with his out-of-control editing technique, which after a while becomes an annoying distraction; these guys are fascinating enough all by themselves. The blare of the background music is also a bit much. Despite these shortcomings, though, if you like taking a voyeuristic peek into other people's lives, Fast, Cheap & Out of Control gives you plenty to look at. --Luanne Brown

点击下载-Fast, Cheap & Out of Control-CLICK HERE DOWNLOAD[EMULE]

骡子上还有改片相关的书一本,点此下载[THE BOOK WITH SAME TITLE]




01.回家门口

02.some山上

03.过分,实在过分




Free-Folk, Grime, R&B, the return of Hardcore – what defined pop music in 2005?
by Simon Reynolds and Dan Fox

The most striking thing about Pop in 2005 is how little conversation there is between black music and white music. Mainstream UK Rock, from Coldplay to whoever’s on the cover of NME this week has never sounded so bleached. The main effect of this (apparently, hopefully) unconscious drive towards sonic segregation is a grievous lack of rhythmic spark and invention. Catch some highly-touted Brit hopeful on the TV programme Later With Jools, and it’s instantly audible how the drummer contributes nothing to the music in the way of feel, tension, or dynamism, but instead just dully marks the tempo. He’s seemingly there simply because that’s what proper Rock bands have – a live drummer.

Things aren’t much different on the Rock underground, where the coolest thing around is Free-Folk (aka Freak-Folk, Psych-Folk … ). Ranging from beardy minstrels like Devendra Banhart to trippy jam bands like Animal Collective and Wooden Wand & the Vanishing Voice, Free-Folk is a recombinant sound that draws on a whole range of historical sources beyond the obvious traditional music and Folk-Rock ancestors. It just so happens that none of them (apart from a trace of utmostly ‘out’ Free Jazz) are black. Free-Folk’s accompanying ideology – a mish-mash of mystical pantheism, paganism, and sundry shamanic/tribalistic impulses – places it in the same continuum as the hippies and the beats, but, significantly, it has broken with Beat’s ‘white negro’ syndrome. Elsewhere in the leftfield, there’s the neo-post-Punk fad, fading somewhat after a good three-year run. These groups engage in white-on-black, Punk-to-Funk action, but only by replaying genre collisions from 25 years ago. Whereas the true post-Punk spirit manifested today would involve miscegenating Indie-Rock with Grime or Crunk.

Because its internal socio-cultural dynamics force it to keep on generating freshness, black music has never really needed to borrow from white music. Hip-Hop has two advantages over Rock. It can draw on a deeply rooted set of black music traditions, characterised by a strong sense of regional identity (hence the plethora of new city-based sounds), and this ensures that it retains, even in this allegedly post-geographical era, qualities of a folk culture. Its other advantage is disadvantage. There’s an urgency to Rap music, fuelled by inequalities of opportunity, that results in ferocious competition between producers and between MCs and stokes the furnace of creativity. That said, the half-decade from 1999 onwards did see Hip-Hop giving itself an extra boost by ransacking the best licks and noises from Techno-Rave and Euro electronica. That pattern began to fade last year, with black Pop reverting to its usual awesome self-sufficiency. Which would be just fine, if the genre hadn’t also start to sputter. For most of the past decade, street Rap and R&B has been the engine of Pop culture, both in its pure form and various teenybop dilutions. Give or take a gem – Amerie’s ‘1 Thing’, Three Six Mafia’s ‘Stay Fly’, Kanye West’s ‘Addiction’ and ‘Crack Music’ – its remorseless rate of innovation stalled this year. And formal advance was always the compensation for its counter-revolutionary content of bling and booty-worship.

Grime would love to be the UK’s Hip-Hop, enjoying the sort of pop culture hegemony that African-American street music holds in its homeland. But you can sense the London scene’s self-belief is flagging. 2005 produced one immaculate scene-reflexive anthem, Kano’s ‘Reload It’, a celebration of Grime’s dog-eat-dog competitiveness; the MC hierarchy where rank is measured by how many rewinds your tune gets. Grime also produced two more low-key but equally inspired tunes about the out-of-reachness (‘Sometimes’, also by Kano) or hollowness (Lethal Bizzle’s ‘Against All Oddz’) of the prize that everyone on the scene is striving so strenuously for. Reporting a Grime story for an American magazine last spring, I was struck by how little presence it had on the streets of London in this, the year of its expected crossover, compared with the way Jungle streamed out of passing cars and Oxford Street boutiques in 1994 (the equivalent breakthrough year). As a critic championing Grime, one of my angles – beyond the sheer excitement of the music, the brilliance of the wordplay, the charisma of the MCs – has been ‘you really ought to check this, it’s the voice of the UK streets.’ But I suspect that not many people actually want to hear what the voice of the streets has to say: partly, because it ain’t pretty, and partly, because most people honestly don’t give much of a fuck. Twenty years ago, the likes of Kano or Bizzle would be NME front cover stars, no questions asked, purely as a matter of basic journalistic responsibility. 

White and black music, then, seem to agree on just one thing at the moment: ‘you can go your own way’, in the immortal words of Lindsay Buckingham. But it’s not clear what conclusions could, or should, be drawn from this. After all, earlier phases of musical miscegenation didn’t, in the end, augur some multicultural Utopia of the future; the last major upheaval of mixing-it-up (Rave culture) was heavily dependent on chemicals. Nevertheless, if there’s any credence left in the notion that the times manifest themselves in music, then this increasing separate development within pop culture isn’t a promising portent.

Simon Reynolds’ book Rip It Up and Start Again: Postpunk 1978–84 was recently published by Faber. At blissout.blogspot.com he also operatesthe weblog Blissblog.

Dan Fox

Although a chronically male-oriented scene, the most significant things being done with loud guitars continue to be by bands pushing the envelope of genres such as Metal or Ind-ustrial. Perhaps better experienced live than on record (and I’ve not seen a more exhilarating live band in years), Lightning Bolt delivered another barrage of skittering, rabbit-punch drums and overdriven bass with their breakneck album Hypermagic Mountain (all releases 2005) whilst Black Metal deconstructionists Sun 0)))’s White 1 saw them further stretching their formalist approach to a maligned genre. Black Dice spread their noisescape blankets anew with Broken Ear Record, though to my ears the brutalism of fellow travellers Wolf Eyes currently provides a more fitting soundtrack to uneasy times.

How Long Are You Staying – the debut by Brighton-based Hardcore outfit Charlottefield – is a fierce fusion of Beefheart-esque rhythmic complexity, pent-up menace and occasional tenderness. At the softer end of the scale, Folk revivalism continues apace; the acid-campfire hysteria of Feels by Animal Collective (who sound like early Tyrannosaurus Rex) contrasts well with Vashti Bunyan’s pastoral laments on Lookaftering, which
sounds as if it could have been recorded any-time in the last 40 years. A River Ain’t Too Much to Love, meanwhile, reaffirms Smog’s special place in the hearts of late night melancholists.

Snoop Dogg’s ‘Drop it Like It’s Hot’ is an elegant piece of sleek innovation with its tuned kick drum that doubled as the bass-line, strange vocal clicks and sparsely deployed, cheesy 1980s breakdown. There is an inventiveness too in the bubblegum Grime of MIA’s Arular; refreshing froth for the summer months. On a scuzzier, lo-fi front, the numerous manifestations of ‘cheap’ or ‘wrong’ music (made largely from computer game consoles) continued to flash above and below radar. Of note: US-based Nullsleep and Bitshifter, and KFC Core, by UK-based DJ Scotch Egg, for some real avian trouble.

A crop of interesting reissues surfaced. Moondog: The Viking of Sixth Avenue was a perfect overview of blind, itinerant composer Louis ‘Moondog’ Hardin’s work, comprising recordings made between 1949 and 1995 that along the way inspired such diverse musicians as Janis Joplin and Philip Glass. The Glasgow School, a long-awaited anthology of fey indie heroes Orange Juice, caused an outbreak of foppishness in my household, swiftly inoculated by the brilliantly titled Livin’ in Fear of James Last, a primer to the darkly humorous sound collages of maverick Industrial innovator Steven Stapleton, aka Nurse with Wound. Le Monde Fabuleux des Yamasuki, originally released in 1972 to promote Franco-Japanese cultural awareness, was resurrected in all its insane, Mikado-meets-Phil Spector glory. Reissued on CD was the 1969 album Black Woman by Free Jazz guitarist Sonny Sharrock; the missing connection between Jimi Hendrix and Sun Ra. Top of my list is Robert Wyatt and Friends; a moving document of the musician’s comeback London concert after the accident that left him paralysed in 1973.

Of artists’ excursions into sound, Sue Tompkins’ low-key performance at the Venice Biennale was a singularly memorable exploration of the outer reaches of vernacular speech. Fellow Glasgow artist Danny Saunders released his debut single Gold, featuring the track ‘Who Made the Takeaway?’ The Red Krayola’s 1981 album with Art and Language, Kangaroo?, was given a welcome fresh lick of paint, and Remixed Water – remixes by younger artists of music by Ned Sublette and Lawrence Weiner – must have similarly delighted many a Conceptual art geek. Both Brian DeGraw’s soundtrack to Oliver Payne and Nick Relph’s Sonic the Warhol and Zeena Parkins’ composition for Daria Martin’s latest film The Loneliness of the Modern Pentathlon are intelligent approaches to the often-abused role of music in artist’s videos. With its voodoo chants and grinding bass Jack Too Jack’s CD release, that also accompanied recent films by Mark Leckey, was similarly satisfying. The Berlin-based Art Critic’s Orchestra should be nominees for best sleeve artwork of the year with their eponymous 12-inch picture disc, alongside Enrico David’s elegant design for Bonnie Camplin’s eerie Heavy Epic, released on Lucy McKenzie’s Decemberism label. A shame these didn’t make the list for ‘Vinyl’, the exhibition of artists records at Neue Museum Weserburg Bremen.

Finally, London-based duo No Bra deserve honorable mention for the most savagely funny lyrics of 2005, in their parody of hipper-than-thou desperation ‘Munchausen’: ‘I have an exhibition here in two weeks’, ‘Really? I’m doing a performance here in three weeks in which I throw chairs around then throw myself around then cut myself 23 times’, ‘Really? I haven’t had a shag in, like, 23 minutes,’ ‘Really? I haven’t been to sleep in ten years’, ‘Really? I used to live without electricity for ten years’, ‘Really? …’.

Dan Fox is associate editor of frieze.




惩治房地产腐败,实现居者有其屋
 
  这些年,中国房价飙升,房地产暴利,人民群众为住房问题所困绕,历尽磨难。在上海等地,几近疯狂地创造出房价3年狂涨300%的神话!

  2005年10月中国卫生组织公布,中国有2400万人患有精神抑郁症,原因就是买不起房子。对于始终在楼市高涨声中焦急观望的老百姓而言,能否买到属于自己的房子,成为始终萦绕心头的声音。

  世纪老人巴金先生生前的愿望中,第一句话就是“希望所有的人都有房子住”。“居者有其屋”依然是我们难以实现的梦想。上个世纪九十年代以来,中国每年的住宅投资增加了十多倍,而住房的矛盾却不断加剧。

  为此,国家对房地产市场采取了调控政策。可一年多过去了,房价依然居高不下。人们不禁要问:中国房地产的问题到底在哪?百姓们何时才能买得起自己安身居住的房子?

  透视房地产暴利

  改革开放20多年来,从来没有哪一个行业像房地产业这样盛产亿万富翁,各种富豪排行榜上,房地产富豪连年占据半壁江山;“中国十大暴利行业”中,房地产业多年稳居“第一名”,暴利绝对值和公众评价恶誉度年年都是五星。据中央统战部和全国工商联的调查表明,房地产业的税后净利润在各行各业中为第一位,比平均水平高5倍,比处于第二的电力煤气行业的利润高1倍。在中国2002年度100名富豪中,竟然有40多人涉足地产业。而福布斯全球富豪榜中,500富豪只有30人左右是地产商。中国的大富豪们异常地集中在地产领域。

  中国房地产业的暴利到底有多大?北京开发商潘石屹无意中证实,这两年开发商都赚了大钱,大的房地产公司一个项目的净利润,可以抵得上中国期货市场与整个电影行业的全年利润。不少房地产商获利的捷径,是从低买高卖中获取本应属于国家和全体国民所有的土地差价。他们所采用的手段,远非一个正常市场环境中的商人所能想象,房地产业的暴利已成为某些利益群体的盛宴。

  暴利把戏。2000年以前,刚复苏的房地产市场遵循的是成本定价,商品房售价基本上是成本加合理利润;2001年至2003年走向火热的楼市选择的是市场定价,房价基本由供求关系决定;而2004年以来,楼市进入由开发商决定市场、自由定价状态。伴随着住房需求不断释放,楼市开始成长、繁荣,而各地的大房地产企业也开始在利益极大化的共同追求中默契配合,渐渐结成价格联盟。一些开发商之间、开发商与销售商之间、销售商与中介之间,合谋制造虚假信息,相互联手抬价,逐层加码,利益共享。房地产公司正是依靠这种价格同盟形成的垄断地位,取得了大大高于生产价格的超额垄断利润。

  成都一位小老板1997年怀揣着一百万杀进四川房地产界,成立了一家房产公司,四年之后,该公司资产就已经逾6亿元,成为成都著名房产公司。该公司发家史被成都一家媒体披露之后,不少市民惊叹:“真是难以置信,做房地产这么容易发财!” 一般来说,房地产商公开的利润是8%-15%,实际上真正的利润都在25%以上。25%的利润,意味着房价的四分之一被开发商揣进了腰包。另一位开发商则很委屈地说,做不到这么高的利润,开发商根本就别想活下来。开发一个项目,前前后后就要盖二三十个公章,每盖一个公章都要打点一番。所以,开发商圈子里常说的一句话是,“舍不得孩子套不着狼。对干部要舍得,对老百姓要哭穷。”所以说,楼盘利润如果少于30%,没人愿意做!

  “2004年度中国纳税500强企业排行榜”中,前300名内没有一家房地产企业的名字出现。不仅如此,上海、广州等城市地税部门近日公布的企业欠税名单显示,来自房地产企业的欠税占了欠税总额的八成以上。有分析人士指房地产暴利下存在着巨大的税收黑洞。巨大的税收黑洞下,北京不到两天就产生一个房地产亿万富翁!一个纳税侏儒,如何担当得起国家支柱性产业的责任?

  近年来,在房地产市场上,一个庞大的房地产利益集团正在形成。开发商、地方政府相关部门和一些“专家学者”、房地产研究机构以及部分媒体联手,占据行业话语制高点。就像当年和庄家沆瀣一气的股市“黑嘴”一样,这些人事实上是当起了“房托”。相形之下,楼市“黑嘴”们更有市场,对舆论的导向作用更大。随着房地产行业的迅猛发展和人们对住房需求的不断增长,房地产走出了行业的狭窄范围,似乎一下成了社会热门和显学,不仅在许多部门、协会和高校冒出了各种房地产研究机构,而且“专家学者”辈出,知名人物纷纷涌现,一些原来与房地产无关的专业人员摇身一变也成为了房地产理论界的“带头大哥”。于是产生了今天这样一种独特的社会景观:专家现身售楼现场,摇唇鼓舌,越来越像商人、售楼小姐;同时商人现身讲坛,著书立说,越来越像专家。

  中国大富豪“暴富流程图”:“制定圈地计划→摆平土地批租方→最低首付资金→取得可套取银行贷款的土地手续→用承建单位资金做到正负零→搞定银行获得抵押贷款→基本完成收益周期。”这一“暴富操作流程图”,一般老百姓可能看不懂。复旦大学经济学院教授华民对它作了通俗的解释:有些人根本没钱,但可以通过各种关系将要收购的国有资产作为事先和约抵押给银行,然后由银行给出现金流转给被收购企业的所有者,而收购者本人一分不出。他不承担任何风险,成功地一夜之间就成为富豪。这种做法的荒唐之处就在于他不仅没有用个人的资本参与市场和协议收购的竞标,而是用银行的钱来购买国有资产,然后变成自己的。更“俗”的注解就是,这类商人极能抓住两种类型的官:一种是地方上握有“资源绝对支配权”的“父母官”,一种是口袋里装着取之不尽用之不竭金钱的“银行官”,然后在“市场—资源—金钱”三者之间进行“资本运作”(“空手倒”)。

  在经济学研究中暴利往往与垄断相生相伴。看看我们的房地产市场状态:土地由政府调控,一级市场土地全部被政府垄断,它决定了供应量;资金的供应量则靠银行贷款,而银行又是以国有银行占统治地位,也由政府控制,它决定了开发总规模;拆迁量的多少决定整个需求量的多少,而拆迁量也是由政府决定。“权力垄断”则进一步推动房地产追逐暴利。

  房地产暴利在于垄断与霸权!当前的中国就像是一个巨大的建设工地,几乎所有的城市都在争先恐后地向外扩张,随处可见正在拆迁的房屋和已被圈占的耕地,城市之间互相比赛着建宽马路、大广场、中央商务区、会展中心、豪华办公楼、大学城……

  房价高涨最主要的原因在于地方政府的推动。它有追求高GDP的冲动,有收取更多土地出让金的冲动,有收取更多房地产税的冲动,当然,还有部分官员的“寻租”冲动。简言之,就是政绩冲动和部分官员的寻租冲动。没有这些冲动,房地产价格不会像今天这个样子。只要地产业是支柱,地方政府就不会真盼降价。城市要借此获得财力改变形象;官员从中要政绩;开发商从中要高利润;银行从中要优质客户;有经济实力的个人和机构投资者从中要赚钱;而作为市场参与一方的大多数普通市民则是这场博弈中典型的输家而被市场边缘化。

  地方政府“经营城市”的做法,事实上对房地产市场起到了“托市”之效。其一,拔苗助长,急于将房地产培育成支柱产业。由于投资规模大、见效快,对相关产业拉动作用明显,不少地方政府在产业规划中,都将房地产业定位为支柱产业来发展,房价越高、高档房越多,对地方政府而言,意味着财政收入增加、GDP增大。为此,一些地方政府一方面加大征地、供地力度,扩大产业规模;另一方面,则通过开发规划、产品结构、预售审批等环节,默许、支持商品房高档化,导致结构失衡。其二,不对商品房进行成本、利润核算,作为生活必需品的商品房,其定价完全放开,基本是开发商报多少是多少。个别城市的个别区县,为了抬高区域档次,开发商将房价定得越高反倒越容易取得预售许可证,反之则要一等再等。

  强势集团利用业已取得的资本和地位优势,鼓吹“弱肉强食”的丛林法则。在这样一个开发商的名声有如过街老鼠的年代,“房产品牌就应该具有暴利”的叫嚣,缘自其忘乎所以的阶层优越。支持开发商欲壑难填并且猖狂叫嚣的资本,正是其从公共权力和公共资源那里得到的阶层优越感和特殊占有地位。他们是被人娇宠的“经济贵妃”,他们不贡献税收收入,但是他们贡献GDP数字,他们把暴利留给自己,把政绩数字送给别人;他们又是左右逢源的“经济章鱼”,先把吸盘伸进银行里,又把8只脚全部伸进买房人的钱袋,然后用别人的钱来造房子,再把造好的房子高价卖给别人。

  地方政府选择了和开发商一致的利益,从而远离了那些无力购房的中低收入群体。卖地、开发、招商引资已经成为各地方政府发展经济、充裕财政的重要手段,而房地产业也被升格为国民经济的支柱产业,房地产之于政府的利益显而易见。资本优势让开发商获得了行政权力的支持,使其如虎添翼,更加强势。现在的一些地方官员,则是瞄准了“推进城市化”以突显政绩。地方政府采用统一收购再以公开拍卖的方式集中配置土地资源的做法,以加大城市基础建设力度为“龙头”,以土地升值为“诱饵”,吸引大量中外资金前来投入,很快就带动了房地产业的繁荣和城市基础建设的突飞猛进。这样一来,不但使自己主政的城市能在很短时间内“旧貌换新颜”,而且直接和间接地大大加快了GDP的增长,大大增加了本地政府的财政收入,从而能够全方位地显示官员的政绩。在城市建设上,追求“形象第一”;在名目繁多的活动上,追求“排场第一”。正是弥漫在各级官员身上的浮躁、浮夸、浮华的“三浮”之风,无节制地吞噬着包括土地在内地的宝贵资源,透支未来的发展空间,损害未来的发展潜力。

  正因为如此,当开发商的利益与这些弱势群体的利益发生冲突时,比如拆迁、规划等过程之中发生矛盾,与开发商具有共同利益的某些地方政府自然会力保开发商,压制甚至剥夺弱势群体的话语权。同样,那些为了买房而负债累累的购房者在与开发商的市场博弈之中,也遭遇了弱势与霸权的鲜明落差。在买房时,购房者只能被动接受房地产价格,只能签订代表开发商利益的霸王合同,没有质保、三包,没有其他商品所具备的合理、完善的退货机制;交完房款以后,不管房屋质量优劣、面积是否缩水、小区配套是否齐备等等,只能照单全收,完全没有话语权。

  片面强调市场化是出现错误的根源。特殊经济环境和条件使定位出现偏差。“哄抬”这个词很妙,哄是用口,也可以理解为助势,抬是用手,可以理解为操作;一种是怂恿者,一种是操作着。

 

 文章中出现禁止的词语,系统不予接受。