<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>图书情报周刊</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/</link><description>LIS Weekly</description><dc:language>zh-CHS</dc:language><generator>.Text Version 1.0.1.0</generator><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>于良芝专论</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346368.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346368.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/346368.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346368.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/346368.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=346368</trackback:ping><description>近日博客、学网、一网中对于良芝博士学术研究之相关评价。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/346368.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>bujai，Antone Gonsalves：Google and My Search History</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346346.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346346.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/346346.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346346.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/346346.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=346346</trackback:ping><description>Google Inc.'s new tracking tool that keeps a detailed history of a person's web search has raised privacy concerns among experts who complain that information collected can't be permanently deleted by the user. &lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/346346.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>Peter Suber：What you can do to promote open access</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346332.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346332.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/346332.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346332.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/346332.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=346332</trackback:ping><description>This list of ways to help the cause of open access (OA) is more comprehensive than earlier lists but still incomplete. I expect to revise and enlarge it regularly. It borrows from the BOAI list (which I helped write), Stevan Harnad's list, the BMC list, and my own earlier list (now offline). I welcome your ideas and comments.&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/346332.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>Marylaine Block：PUSHING LIBRARIANS INTO PUBLIC AWARENESS</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346319.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346319.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/346319.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346319.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/346319.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=346319</trackback:ping><description>A distinction commonly made on the web is between passive information, that sits on a web site and waits for people to discover it, and pushed information, which uses every available format -- weblogs, RSS feeds, e-mail, listserves, etc. -- to reach targeted audiences with known interest in the topic. It seems to me that if librarians truly want to be the go-to people for information, they need to do both: create passive information treasure troves serving the interests of all their users, and p&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/346319.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>Cindy Royal：Tech-savvy women seek support in classroom and newsroom</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346312.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346312.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/346312.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/22/346312.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/346312.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=346312</trackback:ping><description>与图书馆学不太有关，但如果换个角度，从女权主义解释图书馆学倒不失为一个好视角。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/346312.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>Primitivist OR Luddite AND Librarian</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340801.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340801.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/340801.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340801.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/340801.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=340801</trackback:ping><description>it is time to throw the computers and the tech-savvy librarians out of our libraries.&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/340801.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>Good Analysis of RFID Hocus Pocus</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340785.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340785.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/340785.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340785.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/340785.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=340785</trackback:ping><description>On the RFID in Libraries blog, Laura has done a devastatingly good job of dissecting a Berkeley Planet editorial by EFF's Lee Tien and tireless community gadfly Peter Warfield. She points out that, first, it's misleading (it appears to be an "article," not what it is, a bare step above a letter to the editor that would never make it into any reputable media source, and that microscopic lettering identifying it as "commentary" doesn't make it better); and second, it's factually wrong.&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/340785.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>用google搜索无保护的视频音频文件（bujai提供）</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340772.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340772.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/340772.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340772.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/340772.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=340772</trackback:ping><description>在furl里看到一篇googletutor里的文章:Voyeur Heaven: finding interesting video, sound and image files in unprotected directories(偷睽者的天堂:在无保护的目录里寻找有趣的视频、声频和图像文件)，当然又是讲google hack的。虽然我对偷睽没兴趣，但我是资源收集狂，对google的用法着迷，所以看到这类文章如获至宝。文章介绍了方法，主要还是利用google搜索没有首页的服务器，即在搜索"index of"的基础上加了些限定，可以找到视频、音频等等。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/340772.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>数字图书馆专题（keven创作）</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340763.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340763.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/340763.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340763.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/340763.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=340763</trackback:ping><description>keven先生从信息资源、信息技术、资金和人才的角度阐释了他的数字图书馆观点。&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/340763.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item><item><dc:creator>游园</dc:creator><title>How many libraries are blogging anyway?</title><link>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340754.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340754.aspx</guid><wfw:comment>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/340754.aspx</wfw:comment><comments>http://blog.donews.com/LISWeekly/archive/2005/04/18/340754.aspx#Feedback</comments><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/comments/commentRss/340754.aspx</wfw:commentRss><trackback:ping>http://tb.donews.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=340754</trackback:ping><description>While I don’t pretend that these lists are exhaustive, I’d like to think that they provide the most up-to-date info on the library-blogging situation (i.e.: institutional blogs). That said, and per my calculations, there are currently 245 libraries blogging&lt;img src ="http://blog.donews.com/lisweekly/aggbug/340754.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>